Charlie’s Story

Charlie’s Story

Little Charlie was born full term via normal delivery on July 11th 2015.  He is our fourth child and we were all besotted with him.

Soon after Charlie was born I noticed his back was a ‘funny shape’, but I was afraid to say to anyone in case my fears came true.  I was so anxious inside.

When Charlie was just 3 months old my husband was feeding him, and while burping him he noticed his back just wasn’t right.  He told me his concerns and it was at that moment my fears became reality. 

We saw the pediatrician at our local hospital who agreed that Charlie’s back looked ‘off’, and she arranged an X-ray for him.  After the X-ray I was brought into the pediatricians office.  I could immediately see on her screen that there was a curve in Charlie’s spine.  I was absolutely devastated. 

We were then referred to the main Orthopedic hospital in Northern Ireland and we were advised to watch and wait for the next 3 months.
Three months passed and we were back for repeat X-rays to see if the curve in Charlie’s spine had progressed or not.  He was just 7 months old, and X-rays showed his curve had progressed from 28 degrees to 42 degrees in just 3 months.  We were absolutely devastated.  All I could think about was “Charlie needs his little spine to grow”.

We were told Charlie needed to go into a plaster jacket that would be changed under general anesthesia every 6 months, until he would be old enough for the first of many invasive spinal surgeries.  We cried for days.  We never wanted this for our baby.

Once the news sunk in, we began to research.  We wanted to see what the plaster jacket would look like.  After joining the Infantile Scoliosis Outreach Programs (ISOP) Facebook Group, I quickly saw there were different types of casts!   That’s when I began to question what these differences were.  ISOP’s Facebook Group taught me that some casts are designed to hold the curve while others are designed to correct the curve gently.

For us, it was a no brainier.  We had to choose MGGC.  We wanted to try to correct the curve in Charlie’s spine, and potentially avoid him needing surgery.

After many phone calls, emails and endless days and nights of research, we soon realized that MGGC was not offered here in the U.K. or Ireland.  The closest hospital to offer this treatment was Shriner’s Hospital for Children in Philadelphia, USA. 

Yes it was a huge distance, but we were willing to do whatever it took to give Charlie the best chance to avoid invasive spinal surgeries.

Thankfully after a very speedy application and approval process, Charlie was accepted for treatment at Shriner’s Philadelphia.
We traveled from Ireland to Philadelphia in April 2016 when Charlie was just 9 months old.  We met with the incredible team who would be treating Charlie, and we instantly felt a huge relief knowing he was in the hands of an experienced Doctor who specialized in Early Onset Scoliosis and Mehta Casting.

Charlie had an MRI of the full spine which thankfully came back normal, and he was ready to begin treatment.  His curve was now 45 degrees, and he got his first cast under general anesthesia.  As parents it was a shock for us to see our tiny little baby wrapped in a plaster cast.  But after the first day we soon realized that this special cast wasn’t going to hold Charlie back from meeting his milestones and doing what he wanted.

Over the next 2 years and 2 months Charlie received a series of 12 Mehta casts all under general anesthesia.  We would fly back and forth across the Atlantic every 8 weeks so that Charlie could have a new cast applied.
Throughout his treatment he had regular X-rays to check how his spine was responding to the casts. 

In June 2018 we received the news that we had hoped and prayed for, that Charlie’s curve was down to 9 degrees standing out of cast with a fully relaxed spine.  We were just bursting with joy.

Charlie then graduated to a full time brace which he would wear for 23 hours a day until he would outgrow the brace.  Over the next 2 years and 4 months Charlie a total of 3 full time braces.  And in October 2020 it was agreed that Charlie could move to night time only bracing because his spine was holding at 8 degrees.

For the next 9 months Charlie enjoy his new found freedom during the day, and continued with bracing at night.  He then began to outgrow his brace, and we decided to X-ray him in Dublin Ireland and send the results across to Charlie’s Doctor at Shriner’s.

To our amazement Charlie’s spine was completely straight!  There was no measurable curve!  This was the day we had hoped and prayed for since our journey with Charlie began.  Charlie was finally cast and brace free for the first time in over 5 years.

Its been 13 months since Charlie was last in brace, and he is still monitored by X-ray every 6 months or so.  At his last check he was still holding steady.

We will be forever grateful to Dr Min Mehta for developing this gentle non invasive treatment to help guide our little warriors to grow straight.

Tribute to Dr. Min Mehta, MD, FRCS

Remembering Dr. Min Mehta, MD, FRCS

Her global work as a pioneer in championing straight spines helped save the lives of countless babies with Progressive Infantile Scoliosis

For thousands of families across the world and for ACCO, 2005 was one of those remarkable times when we experienced a significant sea change in the treatment of very young children with a diagnosis of life threatening Progressive Infantile Scoliosis.

In 2001 we became acquainted with Heather Hyatt, mother of a beautiful four year old named Olivia, who initially reached out to us to help her find a preschool program for her precious child diagnosed with severe Progressive Infantile Scoliosis.  At the time, Olivia had already undergone halo procedures.  However, Heather never accepted that a single intensive, invasive and premature procedure of spinal fusion surgery was the only way to treat Olivia’s condition.  With courage and determination, Heather began an international search for a cure, and through her perseverance, her journey lead her to the extraordinary and brilliant Dr. Min Mehta, a Pediatric Orthopedic Surgeon from London.  We were unbelievably fortunate to have Olivia join our program and Heather has taught us that nothing is stronger than a parents love for their child.  Unfortunately, Olivia was too old to benefit from Dr. Mehta’s technique, but she has taught us all a lesson in what true strength looks like.  As many of you know, we lost Olivia in February of 2016, however, she will always be remembered in our hearts as the inspiration for the Infantile Scoliosis Outreach Program (ISOP).  Olivia and her story will not be forgotten.   

When Heather met Dr. Mehta, who suffered from juvenile scoliosis, she was pioneering a noninvasive procedure to cure vulnerable babies with Progressive Infantile Scoliosis.  Over the last 12 years, this initiative, spearheaded by Heather, became an established program of ACCO, which has developed into a global effort, spreading knowledge, defining better options for families and organizing free, hands-on training for hundreds of doctors and others on Mehta’s Growth Guidance Casting, resulting in thousands of babies being cured gradually without dangerous surgery.

Dr. Min Mehta left us in August 2017 and while there is no way to adequately express the heartfelt gratitude we feel, we understand how incredibly fortunate we were to have known her and what an honor it has been to work with her.  Dr. Mehta once said that, from the age of six, she had always wanted to be a doctor, and she faced enormous challenges, including a negative and dismissive perception of women in the medical field.  However, this gentle, non-invasive technique would not have been possible without her significant life’s work, and we know her enormous impact will continue to spread around the world.  Heather, as well as many others that knew her, have heard so many life changing and grateful stories from parents and the medical community about the unbelievable impact that Dr. Mehta has had.  She is considered the global authority on the only life threatening condition in the world of pediatric orthopedics. 

For her compassion and dedication to making the world a better place and for her legacy, which she has left for everyone that has been touched by Progressive Infantile Scoliosis, Dr. Mehta will be forever missed but will never be forgotten, nor will the lifesaving work that ISOP will continue to spread until no more children suffer like Olivia and many others with this devastating, painful and life shortening condition.

Its people like you that make this world a great place to live in.

Hello Heather,

I cannot thank you enough, from the bottom of my heart, for how grateful we are.
You are a special person and to get such precise information to us so quick and feeling poorly.

We have a fight on our hands but will will fight and get the best treatment for _____.

Its people like you that make this world a great place to live in.

I will keep you updated and once this has been sorted I will be looking at some point in the future to
highlight infant scoliosis in the UK. Im not sure how but have a group of parents who are up for a bit
of positive media coverage also.

If you are ever in the UK you are welcome in our home.

Love to you and Liv x

Ryan’s Story

Ryan, our wonderful surprise baby, was born just 11 months after his bother. I had no complications during my pregnancy and Ryan was born to term.  Ryan was always laid back and happy. Other than some reflux, he was very healthy. We did notice some differences between Ryan and his older brother. Ryan learned to sit up later than his brother and when he did, he had bad posture. He slouched, and he would plop down and lean back on his little Mickey Sofa. Sometimes he would just stop playing suddenly  and lay down. I used to joke and say he was being lazy.  Shortly after his 1st Birthday, I noticed the ribs on the right side of his back were sticking out. It looked like he had more muscle on that side of his back. I showed my husband and we both knew something was wrong.I got him in to see his pediatrician’s associate. He didn’t seem too concerned, but after I mentioned that Ryan’s older sister had to have surgery for her severe scoliosis at age 12, he told us to have x-rays taken. My husband took him to get his x-rays the next day at a local lab. My husband said that when they took the x-rays, Ryan was laying down; my husband held Ryan’s legs straight, while the tech pulled his arms above his head. This first x-Ray, measured Ryan’s curve at 17 degrees. That night my husband showed me the x-ray and told me that it Ryan has what’s called Infantile or Early Onset Scoliosis. I immediately started searching the internet for information. Luckily, I came across the Infantile Scoliosis Outreach program. I read all about Mehta casting and saw the success stories. I joined the Early Onset & Mehta Casting  Facebook  group and read through every post I could. All of the parents were so helpful. I learned that Ryan’s curve would be worse than 17 degrees since he was lying down and pulled straight for the first x-ray. I learned that he needed a Mehta as soon as possible. He was already 13 months and the best window of time to cast is between 1 and 2 years old. I had also read that parents in our area were taking their children to the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children in Dallas. By the next morning, I was on the phone with Heather Hyatt Montoya. She confirmed that Ryan needed to go to the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital soon. Our pediatrician referred us to the hospital but we were told we would need to wait for 3 months until out initial appointment. With Heather’s guidance, I put together a packet and sent it to the hospital. I was thrilled when we got a call within the week and got an appointment the next month.

At Ryan’s first appointment, proper standing x-rays were taken. The standing x-ray revealed Ryan’s curve was actually 34 degrees and his RVAD was measured at 29. An RVAD over 20 generally means it will progress. We set up a casting date for October 24, 2013. I was nervous for the first casting but I knew my little guys needed this treatment. The best news was hearing that the doctor was able to get great Ryan’s curve down to 11 degrees in cast number 1. Eight months later and Ryan is now in cast #4. His curve is measuring at 8 degrees in cast. He will get his last cast on July 11, 2014.

Ryan is thriving in his cast. He can do everything another toddler his age can do except get wet. He loves playing with his brother, jumping on his trampoline, and going on walks.  He is happy, healthy and his spine is growing straight. We are so blessed to have found Heather and ISOP when we did. We are sharing Ryan’s story to show that Mehta’s EDF casting works! There are still so many pediatricians who don’t screen for infantile scoliosis and so many specialists that don’t recommend casting. I have heard from countless families who were told to “wait and see” which lead to these children missing their window for early treatment. Mehta Casting should be the first option for children like Ryan.

Doctor recommends Mehta Casting, family overjoyed with support from ISOP

Just wanted to provide an update and thank you for your help in getting us headed in the right direction.  Without ISOP we would have had no alternative but to wait six months as the ortho doc requested and our baby would have had a long road ahead of him without Mehta casting.  We were able to get an appointment with Dr. ____, last Wednesday, and he recommended casting!

We go back in two weeks for his first cast and MRI.  Everyone was so nice there and we are just overwhelmed by how blessed and grateful we feel to have found ISOP, had immediate access to and advice from you, and the general encouragement that is given and shared amongst the FB group.  You are really doing something special and amazing, Heather.  If you hadn’t fought so hard to get this alternative established so many families would not be having the experiences they are.

I don’t know how to repay you for the role you have played in our son’s future.  I know we are just starting this journey, that cast #1 may be the hardest, and there are days when I have no idea how we are going to cope and get through it, but I know that we will.  We will keep you and the FB group posted as we continue our journey but I just wanted to check in and most of all share my gratitude.

Sincerely, Dana

A child with Infantile Scoliosis in a Mehta Method Cast

This is our child who is being treated with Mehta Method EDF plaster corrective casts for Progressive infantile Scoliosis. This video was shot approximately 24 hours after having his first cast applied at the Shriners Hospital in Salt Lake City, UT. We have uploaded it to show parents who are considering Early Treatment casting to correct and potentially cure Progressive Infantile Scoliosis how quickly children adjust to the cast. Please visit www.abilityconnectioncolorado.org/newsite/infantilescoliosis to learn more and visit www.girltomom.com to read more about Bexon’s story.

Maggie’s Story

Maggie’s Story

The moment Maggie was born we knew something was wrong.  When the doctors quickly whisk your child away and whisper in a corner, things are probably not going well.  She had severe torticollis on the right side of her neck, causing her face and ear to swell.  While in the hospital she had a quick x-ray, renal ultrasound and echocardiogram – fortunately her heart and liver were functioning properly, although the x-ray revealed a 30 degree spinal curve.

Maggie was a small, full-term baby and a poor eater (Breastfeeding did not work).  Even on breast milk she developed reflux, and gained weight very slowly.  It’s funny looking back on those early days as her nutrition was our paramount priority.  We even took her to a GI doctor and worked tirelessly to get food into her.  While still very small (5 years,  27 pounds), our focus has changed significantly.

Pretty quickly after her birth we were at the orthopedic clinic at our local Children’s Hospital.  The doctors said that usually infantile scoliosis resolves by itself in a few months.  After a year the curve was at 50 degrees – Maggie was becoming noticeably asymmetrical.  Our appointment schedule shifted to every 2 months, with a chest x-ray to assess the curve.  Six months later,  the number was at 60 degrees – the diagnosis was progressive infantile scoliosis.  It was time to start treatment…

5342f03cab28b9f8793a747cMaggie’s curve is very high in the thoracic region of her spine – a very hard place to treat.  In addition, an MRI revealed no rib or vertebrae deformities.  Her spine just wanted to curve.  The recommendation was to start with a Risser cast to shape the spine through pressure on the ribs.  It’s hard to explain the horrible feeling that washes over you as a parent to know that you “opted-in” to a bulky, hot and itchy torso cast.  We took the week prior to the casting as a perfect excuse to go to the beach.  Seeing Maggie in the cast after the procedure brought me to tears.  Waking up from anesthesia as an 18 month old kid now stuck in a cast that weighs one third of your body weight was more than I could handle.  Maggie handled it way better than I did – she was active, mobile, and more or less unaffected.  Her spine also, was unaffected.  Each subsequent visit to children’s revealed a small increase to the curve:  62 degrees, 66, 72, 75, 79, 81, 82, then 90 degrees.  Maggie was amazingly not showing any ill affects of her curve; no shortness of breath, fatigue, or trouble walking.  Still, casting was not working…

unnamed

Our doctors introduced us to VEPTR, an extendable titanium rod which is implanted in the back to manage a spinal curve while a child is growing.  Sounded like the holy grail to us.  “My daughter gets to get out of this cast?  Swim? Take baths?  And the results are very positive??”  Sign us up.  Maggie was around three and a half by this time with no relent to her ever-progressing curve.  “There’s another option as well” our doctor told us, ‘It’s called halo traction”.  Horrified, we could hardly even comprehend the desperation required to engaged in that medieval torture.  “You seriously have to drill a halo into her head?  Then hang her from a pulley in a walker or wheelchair she can’t get out of???”  It literally could have been one of the worst things I could imagine.  “But it’s easily reversible, and isn’t major surgery.” said our Doctor.  We though about that for 10 minutes and concluded: VEPTR it is….

IMG_5808Maggie’s surgery was scheduled a couple days after her fourth birthday.  We told her staying in the hospital would mean as many movies as she wanted – she was very excited.  The surgery took three hours, three nerve-wracking hours, full of pacing, staring at each other, and mindlessly surfing the internet.  She metabolized the anesthesia very quickly, and woke up fast and disoriented in the PICU, without us there.  When we were finally allowed back, it took my wife a long time to calm Maggie down.  Sleeping in hospitals is the absolute worst:  two days in the PICU, and 4 more in the recovery room put a huge strain on my wife, who would not leave.  Maggie’s condition was sub-par, she was unable to move her right arm (fingers moved though), her pain was high, and we were discharged with her hardly walking.  A slow couple of weeks saw her going back to preschool an hour at a time, and some increased right arm movement.  Then everything went bad, very bad…

Maggie suffered an episode at school that put her in a great deal of pain.  She stopped moving her right arm, had a great deal of asymmetrical sweating (only the right side of her face) and was unable to do much but sit on the couch.  We thought it was a strain or a pain spike and that a good night’s sleep would make it better.  It didn’t, her condition worsened.  She was lethargic, scared, and extremely timid – her face resonated pain.  Our doctors did not know what could be causing it, guesses included a muscle tear (they had to cut through many layers of muscle on the right side to seat the VEPTR), an infection, or nerve damage.  We continued to hope that rest and minor physical therapy would improve her condition, it didn’t.  This went on for a month, until her sutures burst on her back – infection was now the known culprit.  Surgery was scheduled to clean out her VEPTRs – it was performed the next day.  She was put on antibiotics and we were sent home.  Her condition slowly but steadily improved and we took her off the antibiotics.  After about a month, constant monitoring of the wound did reveal that the new sutures started to pull apart again, we went back on the antibiotics.  The wound healed as did Maggie’s condition – she regained full movement of her arm, along with her bubbly personality.  She was however on 3 doses of antibiotics everyday, with no real exit strategy other then pulling out the rods.

l.hcVtRNAQETJTFXWb

After the initial VEPTR surgery, Maggie had three extension surgeries.  They had no positive effect.  Her spinal curve was over 95 degrees – I think the doctors must stop giving you exact numbers at this point, as they started telling us “Mid to high 90’s”.  That desperation I talked about above was now on us in full force.  We started getting our minds prepared for the ‘medieval torture devices’ – it was the only reversible option left.  We formulated a plan:  We took Maggie off the antibiotics, and would let the infection tell us that it was time for the rods to come out and the halo traction to go on.  The infection didn’t come back…  Great, now we get to choose when Maggie goes in the wheelchair.  We tried one more extension surgery with no improvement and quickly scheduled the halo traction surgery….

5345cc7fe9cb6a2158db59ddMaggie would be getting her rods pulled out and a halo attached to her skull with eight screws.  I did not cry when I saw her after she woke up from anesthesia.  Her halo was big and bulky, with a large metal hook to attach to the wheelchair/walker’s(forthwith referred to as ‘hardware’) pulley system.  Fortunately, there was no need for the PICU, and we went straight to the recovery room.  Three more nights in the hospital, but Maggie was doing really well – both in terms of her pain and her tolerance for the hardware.  Two days after surgery she was running down the halls of the hospital in her walker, jumping and doing tricks on the pulley system and making friends in the playroom.  I’m lucky I recently upgraded my Subaru Impreza to a Ford F150, I don’t know what we would have done trying to move the hardware in anything but a pickup.  Due to the fact that we currently have only a few weeks of experience with halo traction, I’ll end on this positive note:  After one week of halo traction, and only two days of the final traction weight, Maggie’s curve has gone from over 100 degrees to 66…

You can see/grab some pictures from the Caringbridge site I set up for Maggie’s last two major surgeries:  http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/maggiecondie/photos

Regards,

Ian

At the end of two months, Maggie’s curve is down to 50 degrees.  It amazing for us to see some treatment actually have a positive effect.  I feel horrible now that we even went through the VEPTR surgery, probably a regret I’ll have for the rest of my life.  After the halo came off we had Maggie fitted for a new brace.  One that has a neck brace along with a body brace – Maggie has been wearing that for about 23.5 hours per day.  We’ll get another X-ray in a month to see how her spine looks, but the traction/bracing has given us new hope that we can keep her growing for a years to come.

Nora’s Story

Nora’s Journey Early Onset Congenital Scoliosis

At just five and a half months old, tiny little Nora was diagnosed with congenital scoliosis.  We had noticed a curve in her spine; it was actually hard to see.  You would have only noticed it if you were looking for it or if you were a parent, because that’s what parents do.  After meeting with a pediatric orthopedic surgeon who specialized in scoliosis we learned she had two hemi vertebras in a row (malformed wedge shaped discs) in her thoracic region creating a curve of about 37 degrees at that time.  We learned at that appointment that she would need surgery eventually but for now we would just monitor her through x-rays every three to four months.

It’s also not uncommon for children with congenital scoliosis to have other abnormalities, particularly with the spinal cord itself and heart and kidney abnormalities.  This is because when the spine is developing in a fetus that development happens at the same time as the heart and kidneys.  So Nora was scheduled for a full spine and spinal cord MRI, and echocardiogram and a kidney ultrasound at seven months old.  Thankfully she had no other abnormalities present.

By time Nora was a year old her curve had progressed to 58 degrees and we were at a point where we had to sit down with her surgeon and figure out what to do next. Congenital Scoliosis is tricky.

Technically it is not a subset of early onset scoliosis subset but rather its own category.  This is because the age of onset is prenatal and not between 0 and 5 which is how typical Early Onset is described.  Congenital scoliosis is rare, occurring in only one of every 30,000 births.  Spinal deformities in these patients have different treatments and prognoses based on the severity of deformation of the bone or bones, the pattern of deformity and whether the abnormal bones become more deformed as the child grows.  There is limited research and studies regarding treatment of congenital scoliosis and therefore a lot of different opinions regarding treatment as well.

We wanted to pursue any options we had that were less invasive as surgery.  It was our understanding that bracing very rarely works in congenital cases but metha/EDF casts can be successful.  So when Nora was 14 months old we began the process of Mehta casting.  We didn’t know if it would work, but our surgeon was hopeful.  The goals of casting a child with congenital scoliosis are very different from those with idiopathic scoliosis. With idiopathic the goal is curve correction through a growth guided cast. In congenital scoliosis casting is used to buy valuable growth time before starting down the road of surgery.   We aren’t looking for correction to happen; we are just hoping to slow the curve progression down that naturally happens during growth.

Casting children with congenital scoliosis is controversial and many pediatric orthopedic surgeons simply do not cast. Because congenital scoliosis is complex casting might not even be an option depending on the deformity and where.  We were willing to try and see as the alternative was to just sit back and watch it progress and force into doing surgery sooner than anyone would want.

In the course of a year, we have been through five casts and we are happy to say her curve has held pretty steady and only worsened a degree or two.  We are incredibly grateful we had a surgeon who was willing to take this approach and see if it would work.  Nora is over two years old now and will soon be getting her sixth cast. We know surgery and/or surgeries are in her future and that’s another complicated road ahead of us but for now we are just gonna keep on casting as long as we can.  It can work!

To learn more about congenital scoliosis or Nora’s journey, visit our blog at http://norasjourney-early-onset-congenital-scoliosis.com

Eliana’s Story

We are from a small Midwest town in KS and before the arrival of my 3rd beautiful baby girl on new years eve, 2003, I confess I had never even heard of infantile scoliosis. Utterly uninformed and ill prepared, I had no inkling that within a years time, not only would I have become fluent in the medical terminology, but I would also learn through many slammed doors that this diagnosis can also carry with it a death sentence.

Eliana Jeanne was born at 30 weeks gestation due to my out of control eclampsia/HELLP syndrome and underlying issues. With a birth weight of 2 lbs. 12 oz, she had experienced growth restriction and was tiny for 30 weeks. In spite of the steroid injection for her lungs before birth, they were still seriously under developed and that coupled with a diagnosis of both annular pancreas requiring high risk duodenum resegmentation within 24 hours and an atrial septal defect in her heart, we weren’t given lots of reason to be hopeful. As I nearly simultaneaously met my daughter, I was trying to kiss the air around her hard enough to say goodbye should that be the last time I saw her beautiful tiny pink face. She was given a 15% chance of surviving surgery and coupled with the mounting complications of prematurity, we were given a grim prognosis. Complications of a noscommial strep B infection through her cvc line and a left germinal matrix brain hemorrhage were just two of the life threatening challenges she faced. Over the course of the next 3 long months in the NICU, she battled her way back from deaths door more than once and I became forever changed by the tenacity of spirit I witnessed daily in such a tiny fragile vessel.

Interestingly enough her spine was however…never an issue. Spina bifida oculta ruled out, although there was present evidence of a small sinus dermal tract to her tailbone. It was closed and her spine was perfect. Proven over and over while keeping a close eye upon her lungs. Her perfectly straight spine apparent, week after week in the the chest films taken to warn of pneumonia or scaring. Finally at 3 months old, we took our very tiny miracle, heart monitor and all, home. Thriving now, all things felt possible given enough time, and our lives fell into one of predictable routine. In the weeks preparing for her 6 mo. well baby check, we began growing increasingly concerned about a slightly perceptible shift in her chest wall in the roundness of our grasp…and the fact she always slumped to the left unless being held. After passing her check up with flying colors, her doctor assured me that I was seeing issues out of fear and that I needed to accept that she was healthy now. I politely stated that I would do so as soon as I saw a chest film, and they needed to accept I had no intention of leaving without one. The look on the man’s pale face after returning with her films is one ill never forget, as it would become a repeating vignette over the next 6 months. We were looking at a right thoracic curve with a 55 degree cobb angle, 30 degrees of kyphosis and severe rotation in a spine that had been perfectly straight a mere 3 months prior. In 30 yrs of practice he’d never seen it before, nor did he know how to help us. He did however promise to help us find someone who did, and with that began our Scoliosis journey.

Starting at the closest major city, MRI films in hand, we began ping ponging around in an ever expanding circle of specialists. By our 3rd apointment we were given a traction suit of velcro & straps to derotate her spine, but did nothing except made her uncomfortable. Wait and see they said. More hopeful for our 4th opinion, we forged ahead to that of a highly acclaimed surgeon in St. Louis when she was 10 months old. She barely weighed 11 lbs and by this point had progressed to a lethal 100 degrees with 60 of kyphosis. No congenital reasons, no malformations, hemi vertebrae or underlying diagnosis. Idiopathic and a complete mystery, yet deemed the most severe in its nature. All that was certain was that in conjunction with her underlying lung and heart complications from birth, we were running out of time, so quickly my mind balked at taking its measure. “Wait and see” had become the only option given us due to her size but it was clear now however with her rotation deemed relentless that waiting had never been a viable option. Out of desperation at home we were using a modified gait walker to literally hang her from just below the arms in ‘traction’ several times a day and I had begun doing my own research. It was when “bring her back in 6 months, lets wait and see” was repeated by this renound surgeon, that I first uttered the word casting to this Dr.

True, I admitted, I knew nothing about it, but I was certain what more time would bring and I was willing to try anything at this point. It was also then that his demeanor shifted to one decidedly more curt and his response left me deflated and hopeless. Surgical intervention was not possible due to her small size and severity. I needed to come to terms with it, take her home and keep her comfortable. “Enjoy her while I had her, and we would see where we were in 6 months”. I knew where my baby would be in six months and it made me reel with anger. In disbelief that he was actually just giving up, I again pressed the topic of casting. This time he was entirely dismissive, called it barbaric and questioned what sort of parent would put their child through that. When I stated there was no need for another appointment in 6 months because I deemed waiting & watching her die ‘barbaric’, and that we would be seeking another opinion, he abruptly stood to leave and with the parting statement, “another opinion will probably only confuse you, but of course that is your prerogative” …he disappeared from the room…and so did we, never to look back.
I want to be clear at this point that I am in no way disparaging the hospital in St. Louis, or even this Dr. Merely stating that in 2003, there was vast ignorance regarding the effectiveness of this treatment. In an ironic twist, I later saw this very surgeon that had given us no hope, years later in another panel of specialists there in SLC to learn. I wonder sometimes if it was Elianas updated presentation or her face that struck a chord to his memory…because on that day in the shriners lobby, he was silent but stared long and hard. You see, I had sent him a letter a couple years prior with a picture of Eliana at an age he said she’d never attain with a mere reminder that the option he’d dismissed as barbaric and old school, had managed to do what the surgical approach could not, and humbly asked him to keep an open mind. I was happy to see by his presence that maybe he did.

Far more compassion came from our next appointment in Denver, but sadly, no difference of opinion. 12 months old now and 110 degrees, sleep was fitful at best every night. The evening after our 5 th opinion, in my despair I stumbled across a parent support group online called I.S.O.P. The next morning after being granted access to this group…I finally gasped my first decent breath in months as I began pouring over the data in the links provided on the sight. Information about Dr. Min H. Mehta and her serial casting approach as a means to in some, cure, but in others, to buy precious time to grow. It was the first ray of hope afforded us since this had all started and I immersed myself in it into the early morning. Through the guidance and wisdom of the sites founder, Heather Hyatt Montoya, and her own incredible journey to help her daughter…the links to data published in Europe along with the support of parents on the site who helped narrow my focus, I settled upon the Shriners Hospital in Salt Lake City, Utah. Casting was available there and although retired, Dr. Min Mehta herself was traveling there for the very first Early Treatment Trial Project, showcasing her 40 years of data and bringing her style to the interested Dr.s here in the states. Eliana recieved her first cast at 13 mo old, in early stage cardiac failure from the pressure of her own tiny spine. Although her first cast was not a Mehta style e.d.f. cast (the first E.T.T.P was a couple months away) it saved her life and I attended that life changing conference with my once again thriving and growing baby girl.Every subsequent cast, starting with #2, through #33 which she is wearing now, nearly 10 years later, have been Mehta’s style growth guidance casts that have saved her life & become part of us now.

At 13 months, 115 degrees, 80 kyphosis and early stage cardiac failure… Eliana received her first cast with scaresly a second left to spare. We managed to harness one precious year of rapid infancy type growth before the rigidity of her curves made it become obvious that casting might not be a cure for us, but it has without a doubt become the one and only life saving tool with which we bought my daughter precious time to get to where she is now. Happy, healthy, beautiful, nearly 11 year old girl who is now big enough to embark upon the next step in her journey. We begin halo gravity traction in about 3 weeks in our hospital home away from home, and then on to growth rod surgery. A new approach brought to fruition within the last couple years, invented during this precious time the casts have purchased us.

I sobbed the first time I shook Dr. Mehta’s hand at that first ETTP, in awe of all that I’d been so lucky to find. It was a lifesaving miracle and I will forever owe Min Mehta’s research, our Doctors willingness and I.S.O.P’s assistance, an impossible debt. To that end is why I write this. I owe it to them and to every parent out there who has sat, blinking back tears at a computer screen desperate to find something that can at the very least offer a modicum of time. There is much more acceptance of this treatment now than the beginning of our journey thanks in large part to I.S.O.P. However as is true of all things in this age of information, there is much mis-information out there as well and sadly many children are still falling through the cracks. Its become increasingly clear to me how paramount getting out the accurate information is becoming.

I must state for the sake of that accuracy, and honesty, it was a very difficult thing to go through, that first cast. In spite of the fact it saved her life I still caught myself wondering as she cried nearly inconsolably upon first waking, “my God what have I done?” I thought it for hours as she barely ate and as I floundered at attempt upon attempt to get her diaper on, as she lie there already soaked in pee up her back within hours of what was meant to be a 3 month cast. Once the tears from the procedure subsided, the tears of frustration kicked in from it taking her newly acquired ability to crawl the first couple days, and now I cried openly with her. With each day however we both grew stronger and more accustom. She quickly learned to crawl again, and I how to care for the diapering and cast. She even learned to walk, all the while in a cast…and a small bike helmet for good measure, (we had hardwood floors). Each successive casting grew more manageable as we both learned what to expect…and the bounce back time has shortened after each and every cast since. She is now nearly 11 years old…and in her 33rd cast. Braces, although effective for some, don’t hold her rotation and at this point, stabilization is what we’re cultivating. Casting will not be a cure for my girl, but it has purchased us precious time to grow, and run and laugh and live a remarkably normal childhood. Thanks to casting, again like when I first brought her home, all things seem possible, given enough time.

Its why I feel compelled to say, don’t ever give up in pursuit of another opinion if your not being heard. Don’t believe every casting approach is the same, they are not. Pursue the data, the lions share of which came from the lifelong devotion and research of Dr. Min H. Mehta and has been made available through I.S.O.P. Don’t believe it if your told this approach is the old way or that its barbaric, it is not. Don’t accept “wait and see” in a curve you see with an increasing RVAD, the first couple of years when most flexible is time you cannot get back. We learned the hard way. Try to not get too caught up in the numbers. Its a marathon, not a sprint. More than that though, she’s absolutely thriving! Growing and attending school with her peers. Its true, impatience has lead me to other research just as I am certain we all have at some point…but it all leads to one inescapable truth. If I could leave you with one final thought it would be of that truth. Once instrumentation is introduced into the body the odds of complication are nearly 100%. If you think there is even the potential for this gentle, non invasive approach to help your young child…I implore you to empower yourself.

God bless
Carrie J. Halfhide

Tummy Time, Back to Sleep and Infantile Scoliosis….What Do they All Have In Common?

In the early 1940s, Dr. Harold Abramson, a New York pediatrician, pored over heartrending reports of babies who accidentally suffocated while they slept. As he reviewed case after case, he noticed that a vast majority of the deaths occurred when babies slept on their stomachs. After decades of additional research the federal government, the American Academy of Pediatrics and child advocacy groups formally launched the Back to Sleep campaign,   instructing parents to place infants on their backs for sleep for the first year.  There’s no question the Back to Sleep campaign has helped save lives.  Since 1994 the rate of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) has declined by more than 50 percent.  What this campaign has also effectively done is scare new parents so much that they don’t want to put their babies on their tummies ever.

More research suggests taking away “tummy time,” cuts off a pivotal avenue of development. The less time infants spend on their stomachs, the slower they generally are to acquire motor skills during their first year, which means the potential delay of simple feats like lifting their heads as well as more-complicated movements like rolling over, crawling, and pulling to stand. Doctors have hesitated to sound the alarm about this, since children usually walk shortly after their first birthday regardless of how much tummy time they’ve had. But a growing body of evidence now suggests that the timing of the motor-skill milestones that precede walking is crucial and can even factor into long-term health and cognitive ability.  Pediatricians however, have had mixed reactions to this and have passed this off as inconsequential.  Others, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, champion of the Back to Sleep campaign, have seen the head shapes and motor hang-ups as a harbinger of future problems and recommended supervised tummy time when a baby is awake.

Here’s where infantile scoliosis fits in.  Parents are seeing the potential of death as outweighing the potential of delayed motor skills.  What parents aren’t hearing are the increased risks of Infantile Scoliosis, the most challenging orthopedic condition in babies, from not having sufficient tummy time.

Prior to the 1980s the incidence of infantile scoliosis was much higher in Europe where infants were commonly placed on their backs to sleep.  During this time babies in the US were traditionally placed on their stomachs to sleep and the incidence of infantile scoliosis was a rare phenomenon in North America accounting for less than .5% of all diagnosed cases of scoliosis.    During the 1980s Europeans adopted the tummy sleeping position for children and the incidence of infantile scoliosis dropped to record low numbers.

Now take a look at Scotland before the 80s, where parents were routinely advised to place their infants to sleep on their backs, cases of infantile scoliosis accounted for 41% of all diagnosed scoliosis cases. After 1980 Scotland reversed their stance on back sleeping and the incidence of infantile scoliosis in Scotland dropped to 4%.  At the same time there is research going as far back as 1966 that states one of the benefits of stomach sleeping was the prevention of scoliosis.

So what do parents do with this conflicting information? Putting an infant to sleep on his or her back is without a doubt the recommended sleep position for a baby’s first year of life.  However tummy time is equally important and recommended for motor skill development and the prevention of scoliosis.  The key is getting a sufficient amount of tummy time in.   Parents should be encouraged to have their babies spend a healthy chunk of awake time on their tummies. This should begin soon after birth once the umbilical cord stump has fallen off.  Several times a day so the child becomes used to it early on and likes it.  There are lots of ways parents can practice tummy time, propping a baby on a nursing pillow while on the floor with them or even on a parent’s chest are great ways to get that added tummy time in and keeping everyone comfortable.  Baby wearing is also greatly encouraged, as it too also helps promote physical development and decreases the risks of a baby developing infantile scoliosis. When parents choose a baby carrier it’s important to look for one that is comfortable to wear but is also ergonomic for baby.

801 Yosemite Street   |   Denver, CO 80230   |   303.691.9339   |   info@abilityconnectioncolorado.org